2012
DOI: 10.1080/01647954.2012.715671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new record and two new species of the genusTyphlodromusScheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new species, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) spicae sp.n., belongs to a group of species with 4 pairs of solenostomes (gd2, gd6, gd8, gd9) on the dorsal shield, ventrianal shield pentagonal and without preanal pores. We reduced the 29 species with similar characters to 23 based on synonyms and possible synonyms suggested in Ferragut & Ueckermann (2012); Stathakis et al (2012);and Tixier et al (2016). Z4 is about 0.7 times the length of Z5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This new species, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) spicae sp.n., belongs to a group of species with 4 pairs of solenostomes (gd2, gd6, gd8, gd9) on the dorsal shield, ventrianal shield pentagonal and without preanal pores. We reduced the 29 species with similar characters to 23 based on synonyms and possible synonyms suggested in Ferragut & Ueckermann (2012); Stathakis et al (2012);and Tixier et al (2016). Z4 is about 0.7 times the length of Z5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions are listed for the holotype, with variations of paratypes in brackets. The Phytoseiidae database by Ferragut & Ueckermann (2012), Stathakis et al (2012), Demite, et al (2014 and Tixier et al (2016) were used in confirming the new species. The setal notations adopted were those of Lindquist & Evans (1965), as adapted by Rowell et al (1978) for the dorsum.…”
Section: Description Of a New Phytoseiidae Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most phytoseiid taxonomists have by now accepted a series of morphological characters that should be taken into account for accurate description of new species. The features considered are reported in illustrations, showing the habitus of the dorsal and ventral shields, dorsal and ventral chaetotaxy and adenotaxy, macrosetae present on leg IV, shape of chelicera, number of teeth on the movable and fixed cheliceral digits, and the shape of the insemination apparatus (usually reported in phytoseiid literature as spermatheca or spermathecal apparatus) (Beard, 2001;Kolodochka, 2005;Castro et al, 2010;Kreiter & Tixier, 2010;Ferragut & Ueckermann, 2012;Stathakis et al, 2012;Tsolakis et al, 2012). When the above characters are not sufficient for the definition of a species, biological tests or DNA analyses can be helpful to clarify complex situations (Tixier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%