2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new recombinant F1 antigen as a cost and time-effective tool for plague diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the protocol here established requires 750 ng of F1 antigen per tested sample (using triplicates), HA spends 20,000 ng of F1 per tested sample (considering the standard eight dilutions according to Chu [10], resulting in the use of approximately twenty-seven times more antigen per sample. This difference can be particularly relevant for plague diagnosis given the complexity and costs of producing and purifying F1 from extensive Y. pestis culturing in biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the protocol here established requires 750 ng of F1 antigen per tested sample (using triplicates), HA spends 20,000 ng of F1 per tested sample (considering the standard eight dilutions according to Chu [10], resulting in the use of approximately twenty-seven times more antigen per sample. This difference can be particularly relevant for plague diagnosis given the complexity and costs of producing and purifying F1 from extensive Y. pestis culturing in biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera from rabbits immunized with formol-killed Y. pestis and other pathogenic Yersinia strains (whole-cells immunization) or with the purified F1 antigen, produced as previously described [23] for positive control in routine diagnosis and were kindly provided by the SRP. From the 37 positive control sera, 14 were from rabbits exposed to the reference EV76 or A1122 Y. pestis strains in independent experiments, 18 were from rabbits exposed to diverse Brazilian Y. pestis strains from the Fiocruz-CYP (http://cyp.fiocruz.br) bacterial cultures collection and five were from rabbits exposed to the purified F1 antigen (three native F1 and two recombinant F1, expressed in E. coli) [23]. Additionally, to evaluate whether the ELISA test would present cross-reaction with other Yersiniae, five rabbits immunized with distinct isolates of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and two with Yersinia enterocolitica were included.…”
Section: Rabbit Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera from rabbits immunized with formol-killed Y . pestis and other pathogenic Yersinia strains (whole-cells immunization) or with the purified F1 antigen, produced as previously described [ 27 ] for positive control in routine diagnosis were kindly provided by the SRP. From the 37 positive control sera, 14 were from rabbits exposed to the reference EV76 or A1122 Y .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 25 positive control sera were derived from rabbits immunized with formol-killed Y. pestis or with the purified F1 antigen, as previously described (Tavares et al, 2020). Three of those were from rabbits immunized with the reference EV76 or A1122 Y. pestis strains in independent experiments, 18 were immunized with diverse Brazilian Y. pestis strains from the Fiocruz-CYP bacterial culture collection maintained at the Aggeu Magalhães Institute (http://cyp.fiocruz.br), and four were immunized with the F1 antigen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%