2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new rail optimisation model by integration of traffic management and train automation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The architecture of a C-DAS depends on the allocation of the intelligence between the control center and the train. Three main different ways of distributing the DAS intelligence can be identified (Panou et al, 2013;Rao et al, 2016):…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architecture of a C-DAS depends on the allocation of the intelligence between the control center and the train. Three main different ways of distributing the DAS intelligence can be identified (Panou et al, 2013;Rao et al, 2016):…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A driverless configuration could be applied where there is no interaction with pedestrian and car driver to increase the human driver attention and vigilance and to increase the eco-driving performance as in Rao's Work (Rao et al, 2016). When the vehicle interacts with pedestrians, cars and other trains, CEDRICS may activate another controller that assesses an advice dedicated to the human operator to support the manual eco-driving.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, the scheduling and routing of AGVs is very similar to that of scheduled rail systems [35][36][37] temporal resource can only be occupied by at most one train. It can be shown that the scheduling and routing of AGVs are also a variant of the vehicle routing problem, and the readers can refer to [32,38] for detailed reviews on the corresponding solution approach and applications of AGVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%