2015
DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new quantitative rating scale for dyskinesia in nonhuman primates

Abstract: The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative scale to assess levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) in non-human primates using a video-based scoring system (Quantitative Dyskinesia Scale, QDS). Six macaques with stable parkinsonism and LID were used for tests of the new QDS, in comparison with our current standardized scale (Drug Related Side-effects, DRS), which provides a classic subjective measurement of dyskinesia. QDS scoring is based on systematic movement counts in time frames, using videotape recor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor evaluations were performed using a standardized primate motor scale (PMS) for MPTP‐treated monkeys (see the scale in Supplementary Information) . The PMS has two parts: motor disability is rated in Part I (which is similar to Part III of the UPDRS used for PD patients), and LIDs are rated in Part II .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motor evaluations were performed using a standardized primate motor scale (PMS) for MPTP‐treated monkeys (see the scale in Supplementary Information) . The PMS has two parts: motor disability is rated in Part I (which is similar to Part III of the UPDRS used for PD patients), and LIDs are rated in Part II .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor evaluations were performed using a standardized primate motor scale (PMS) for MPTP-treated monkeys (see the scale in Supplementary Information). [30][31][32] The PMS has two parts: motor disability is rated in Part I (which is similar to Part III of the UPDRS used for PD patients), and LIDs are rated in Part II. 28 In addition, animals were assessed with the Drug Effects on the Nervous System (DENS) scale 33 to evaluate other potential neurological side effects of MR1916 or amantadine.…”
Section: Behavioral Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of such scales available, each differing slightly by areas of emphasis. [1][2][3]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a couple groups have used motion sensor and accelerometers to track dyskinesia and severity in PD patients with LIDs and found that they could separate LID activity reliably from PD symptoms (Keijsers et al, 2003;Mera et al, 2012). Similar studies in non-human primates are also promising (Potts et al, 2015). Though still preliminary, studies such as these are promising and could lead to significant advances in the way physicians look at LIDs and provide insight into the mechanism of movement disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a group studied the use of a quantitative video-based scoring method in the MTPT primate model to more objectively study LIDs (Potts et al, 2015). Studies such as this highlight how technological advances may aid in the clinic as not all patients will present with the same LID severity and expression of LID subtypes.…”
Section: Non-human Primate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%