Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2006
DOI: 10.2523/102770-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Pulsed Neutron Sonde for Derivation of Formation Lithology and Mineralogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability to make a direct measurement of the TOC from the wellbore, and thus the reliance on empirical approaches, is one of the reasons why core analysis is used more readily for determining TOC and estimating the maturation of source rocks Montgomery et al, 2005). The benefit of making an in situ carbon measurement of the formation, using a geochemical logging sonde (Pemper et al, 2006), will be demonstrated with the discussion of the shale gas facies expert system. …”
Section: Lithofacies Effects On Empirical Methods Used For Shale Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inability to make a direct measurement of the TOC from the wellbore, and thus the reliance on empirical approaches, is one of the reasons why core analysis is used more readily for determining TOC and estimating the maturation of source rocks Montgomery et al, 2005). The benefit of making an in situ carbon measurement of the formation, using a geochemical logging sonde (Pemper et al, 2006), will be demonstrated with the discussion of the shale gas facies expert system. …”
Section: Lithofacies Effects On Empirical Methods Used For Shale Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is a rule-based expert system. The expert system uses geochemical data from a new geochemical logging sonde called the Formation Lithology Explorer (FLEX sm )and Spectra Log II (SLII sm ), which, used in tandem, measures and collects Si, Ca, Fe, S, Ti, Gd, Cl, Mg, Al, and C, and naturally occurring radioactive K, U, and Th data from the formation (Pemper et al, 2006). This chemical data is then used to determine the general lithology, then the specific lithology and finally the mineralogy and the TOC for each interval measured (Jacobi et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Shale-gas Facies Expert Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Pemper et al 2006 and. These geochemical instruments investigate the inelastic, capture and natural gamma ray energy spectra to obtain elemental yields and weight fractions of various elements including Al, C, Ca, Fe, Gd, K, Mg, S, Si, Th, Ti and U. Lithology and mineralogy are then determined by an Expert System which uses the elemental weight fractions from the geochemical measurements as input.…”
Section: Shale Lithology and Mineralogy Loggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was first applied in well logging 33 years ago (Goldman, 1978;Sherman, 1976) and continues to be practiced with contemporary tools (Pemper, et al, 2006). It is important to know how much material is required and to what extent the area near the detector must be shielded to obtain the maximum benefit.…”
Section: Thermal Neutron Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, standard spectral responses for neutron-induced spectroscopy tools have been derived from a series of measurements made in formations whose chemical composition is believed to be well known, tanks of various liquids and, in some instances formations fabricated to emphasize the response of a given element (Hertzog, 1978;Pemper, 2006). Invariably, the process of deriving the standard spectra from laboratory measurements for neutron-induced gammaray spectroscopy tools involves subjective methods to isolate, or strip, elemental responses from those of other elements present in the measurement.…”
Section: Elemental Standard Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%