2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(99)01722-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new protocol for the determination of magnetic structures using simulated annealing and representational analysis (SARAh)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
457
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 576 publications
(476 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
11
457
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All measurements were conducted with a neutron wavelength of 2.41Å and a collimation of 12 -open-6 . The NPD data was analyzed using the Rietveld refinement program FullProf [25] and the representational analysis software SARAh [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measurements were conducted with a neutron wavelength of 2.41Å and a collimation of 12 -open-6 . The NPD data was analyzed using the Rietveld refinement program FullProf [25] and the representational analysis software SARAh [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the propagation vector is k = (0, 0, 0), the magnetic unit cell is identical to the nuclear cell. The whole symmetry analysis may be performed by hand [23] or by using one of the available computing programs doing the work automatically [24][25][26]. We use hereafter the program BasIreps [24].…”
Section: ------------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilising version 2K of the representational analysis program SARAh [13], we have exploited the group theory approach to determine the magnetic structures allowed by symmetry. The results of the calculation show 3 possible irreducible representations (IR): Γ 2 , Γ 6 , Γ 8 that correspond to a G-type antiferromagnet where the moments are oriented along the [001], [-110] and [110] directions, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%