2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0218216510008157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Proof That Alternating Links Are Non-Trivial

Abstract: We use a simple geometric argument and small cancellation properties of link groups to prove that alternating links are non-trivial. Unlike most other proofs of this result, this proof uses only classic results in topology and combinatorial group theory.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We give a correspondance between the two viewpoints: if Γ satisfies the non metric conditions C(p) − T (q) O ("O" for "Ollivier"), then each megatile diagram of a minimal diagram is a [p, q]-map, in the terminology of [4]. Then we obtain an analogous result to the main technical result of classical small cancellation theory in the non-metric case (see [4] theorem 6.3 p 262 and theorem 7.6 p 265) giving solutions to the word and conjugacy problems, from the graph viewpoint: see theorem 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We give a correspondance between the two viewpoints: if Γ satisfies the non metric conditions C(p) − T (q) O ("O" for "Ollivier"), then each megatile diagram of a minimal diagram is a [p, q]-map, in the terminology of [4]. Then we obtain an analogous result to the main technical result of classical small cancellation theory in the non-metric case (see [4] theorem 6.3 p 262 and theorem 7.6 p 265) giving solutions to the word and conjugacy problems, from the graph viewpoint: see theorem 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is also clear that if a prime alternating presentation P (Γ, R) of a knot contains at least one crossing, then the knot is not trivial, as it is easy to show that the shortest relation has length 4, and all the generators of P (Γ, R) are meridians or their inverses (see [5]). If the group were Z, then there would be a relation of length 2.…”
Section: (γ R) Satisfies the Small Cancellation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%