1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02756797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new proof of the Amitsur-Levitski identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is shown in [20, p. 104 Proof This statement is a direct implication of the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem [21]. (C(3, 1)).…”
Section: Corollary 46mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As it is shown in [20, p. 104 Proof This statement is a direct implication of the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem [21]. (C(3, 1)).…”
Section: Corollary 46mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The hard part of this result, namely that M d (k) satisfies S 2d = 0, is known as the Amitsur-Levitzki Theorem [39]. All known proofs are either messy (e.g., by graph theory [135]) or tricky (e.g., using exterior algebras [128]). The reader is invited to attempt to find a new proof!…”
Section: Var(c) = H S P(c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other proofs of the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem were later obtained: in 1963, R. G. Swan [24] reduced the original problem to a graph theory problem; in 1974, L. H. Rowen [21], used a direct method in his proof; in 1976, S. Rosset [20] gave a fast proof based on the Hamilton-Cayley theorem. Finally in 1981 [11], Kostant closed the subject once and for all by providing a very nice interpretation of the theorem in the context of representation theory and generalizing it using his separation of variables theorem [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%