2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-018-3259-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Proof of Harish-Chandra’s Integral Formula

Abstract: We present a new proof of Harish-Chandra's formula [1] Π(h1)Π(h2)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approximation is justified by the geometric observation that, since the equations and inequalities defining the BZ polytope depend linearly on pλ, µ, νq, the difference between the number of integral points in H sν sλ sµ and in H sν´k sλ sµ must be lower order than s dr for s large. Finally using relation (31), we obtain ÿ κPK r κ C sν sλ sµ κ « C sν sλ sµ " P ν λµ psq " a dr s dr `lower-order terms, whence the identification J pλ, µ; νq " a dr " Vol rel pH ν λµ q .…”
Section: J and The Euclidean Volume Of The Bz Polytopementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This approximation is justified by the geometric observation that, since the equations and inequalities defining the BZ polytope depend linearly on pλ, µ, νq, the difference between the number of integral points in H sν sλ sµ and in H sν´k sλ sµ must be lower order than s dr for s large. Finally using relation (31), we obtain ÿ κPK r κ C sν sλ sµ κ « C sν sλ sµ " P ν λµ psq " a dr s dr `lower-order terms, whence the identification J pλ, µ; νq " a dr " Vol rel pH ν λµ q .…”
Section: J and The Euclidean Volume Of The Bz Polytopementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Harish-Chandra-Itzykson-Zuber (HCIZ in the following) integral [1] [2] [3] is defined in the RMT setting as:…”
Section: Harish-chandra-itzykson-zuber Integrals and Free Summentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection we introduce a finite difference operator called the box spline Laplacian, which allows us to give a convenient new representation of the discrete convolution with b. This leads in turn to a reformulation of the convolution identity in Corollary 5.1 and to a representation ofÂ(Φ + ) as a finite difference operator on the space D(Φ + ) defined in(28), both of which will be useful in Section 5.4 below. For τ in the weight lattice, let ∆ τ and ∇ τ denote respectively the forwards and backwards finite difference operators in the direction of τ :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%