2005
DOI: 10.3905/jod.2005.517185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Procedure for Pricing Parisian Options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that since we have chosen the window length D as the unit of time, all parameters (r, σ) are correspondingly normalized depending on the window length. Using the same parameters as in [4], σ = 0.2, r = 0.05, T = 1 year, K = 95, and L = 90, we obtain similar results. Below is the code, using the above parameters, number of time steps n = 1000, d = 3 months, and initial price S 0 = 92.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that since we have chosen the window length D as the unit of time, all parameters (r, σ) are correspondingly normalized depending on the window length. Using the same parameters as in [4], σ = 0.2, r = 0.05, T = 1 year, K = 95, and L = 90, we obtain similar results. Below is the code, using the above parameters, number of time steps n = 1000, d = 3 months, and initial price S 0 = 92.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Avellandea and Wu [3] used a lattice method. Labart and Lelong [9] used an inversion formula based on the Abate and Whitt [1] method, while Bernard, Courtois, and Quittard-Pinon [4] obtained numerical prices by approximating the Laplace transforms using a linear combination of fractional functions. In this paper, we used a different method to obtain the option price without numerically inverting its Laplace transform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1%. We could try to solve this by using instead of the standard FFT the alternative inversion algorithms as Euler summation, which is proposed by [2], or approximation of the Fourier transform by polynomiallike functions of which the inverse is known, as has been done by [3]. Here we introduce a slightly modified version of the Euler summation, the average summation, because it seems to fit better to the limiting properties of the Fourier transform; but it has the same drawback as the other methods, which is that it is not possible to give a reasonable bound for the truncation error without using heuristics.…”
Section: Remarks On the Truncation Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have established pricing formulae for MinParisianHit and MaxParisianHit options. These fair prices contain single Laplace transforms which need to be inverted numerically using techniques as in Labart and Lelong [17], Abate and Whitt [1] and Bernard et al [4].…”
Section: Option Triggered At Maximum Of Parisian and Hitting Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%