1983
DOI: 10.1021/ja00351a023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new probe of solvent accessibility of bound photosensitizers. 1. Ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) photosensitizers in sodium lauryl sulfate micelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that the k nr values for Os(II) and Ru(II) complexes in hydroxylic solvents are much higher than the trend observed in polar organic solvents, with H 2 O having the most dramatic effect [26][27][28][29]. It has been shown that the k nr of [Os(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and [Os(phen) 3 ] 2+ in H 2 O are large compared with those in D 2 O despite the same emission energy [26] (where phen = 1,10-phenanthroline).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been found that the k nr values for Os(II) and Ru(II) complexes in hydroxylic solvents are much higher than the trend observed in polar organic solvents, with H 2 O having the most dramatic effect [26][27][28][29]. It has been shown that the k nr of [Os(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and [Os(phen) 3 ] 2+ in H 2 O are large compared with those in D 2 O despite the same emission energy [26] (where phen = 1,10-phenanthroline).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The non-radiative rate constant (k nr ) and emission energy of Os(II) and Ru(II) polypyridyls are strongly solvent-dependent [26][27][28][29]. k nr experiences a dramatic increase in hydroxylic solvents with a corresponding decrease in emission energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic interactions between the enantiomeric complexes and polyelectrolyte may induce changes in the excited state properties either due to electrostatic association or intercalation. 42 Cationic complexes usually bind to DNA noncovalently as the cationic core of the complexes exerts a strong electrostatic attraction to the anionic phosphate backbone of DNA, thus precluding substantial overlap with the base pairs leading to a higher emission intensity indicative of electrostatic binding to the DNA. It is interesting to note that an increase in emission intensity yields the electrostatic association.…”
Section: Steady-state Emission Titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, no acceptable agreement between measured and calculated (or experimental) partition coefficients of such solutes was observed. It is also worthwhile to mention that the mechanism of binding of the cationic chelates to micelles is far more complicated than in the case of neutral complexes, and might involve the location of ligands in differing regions of the micelle [40]. As can be seen in Table 3, three of four sets of log P values involved in computation work fairly well as descriptors of micellar-mediated retention; this is a striking result given that most of the neutral metal complexes of interest have a good deal diverse ligand structure (see Fig.…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%