2015 6th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icsess.2015.7339003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new probable decision making approach for verification of probabilistic real-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66,[91][92][93] Some well-known model checkers are applied to verification approach such as NuSMV, § SPIN, ¶ PAT, # and UPPAAL**. 74,94 The existing model checking methods specify a state space exploration of the system behavior using reachable graph of binary decision diagrams. 18,95 96 presented a model checking method on the agent-based service composition approach.…”
Section: Model Checking Methods In the Service Composition Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…66,[91][92][93] Some well-known model checkers are applied to verification approach such as NuSMV, § SPIN, ¶ PAT, # and UPPAAL**. 74,94 The existing model checking methods specify a state space exploration of the system behavior using reachable graph of binary decision diagrams. 18,95 96 presented a model checking method on the agent-based service composition approach.…”
Section: Model Checking Methods In the Service Composition Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model checking approach has 2 main methods including KS and LTS . Some well‐known model checkers are applied to verification approach such as NuSMV, SPIN, PAT, and UPPAAL . The existing model checking methods specify a state space exploration of the system behavior using reachable graph of binary decision diagrams …”
Section: Categorizing Of Selected Service Composition Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important functional properties are illustrated as follows: Correctness properties: A property that checks the existing specification rules that should be satisfied in the state space of the system behavior. Reachability: A problem that refers to an assumed set of objective states that can be reached preliminary from a fixed set of initial states. Deadlock: A state that each individual from a gathering of activities is sitting tight for some other part to release a lock position. Safety: A condition that a path will never occur in the total of the system behavior. Liveness: Liveness occurs when an event happens in a series of finite paths in parallel. …”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can define a path on the LT behavioral model of the MFO‐WSC algorithm as follows Definition A labeled path LTP is a finite sequence of states and events starting from state s 1 and finishing at state s 2 ( s 1 and s 2 S ) denoted as: LTP = s 1 falsebold-italicebold1 s 2 falsebold-italicebold2 s 3 … s n −1 falseen s n such that ( k , v ): ( s k , e v , s k + 1 ) ∈ T .…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%