2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-6567-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new probability density function for spatial distribution of soil water storage capacity leads to the SCS curve number method

Abstract: Following the Budyko framework, the soil wetting ratio (the ratio between soil wetting and precipitation) as a function of the soil storage index (the ratio between soil wetting capacity and precipitation) is derived from the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method and the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) type of model. For the SCS-CN method, the soil wetting ratio approaches 1 when the soil storage index approaches ∞, due to the limitation of the SCS-CN method in which the initial soil mois… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ranges and Units of Parameters for the Daily Water Balance Model (Kollat et al, 2012;Wang, 2018), and the Calibrated Parameter Values for 12 Selected Catchments (Locations Shown in Figure 10) Index USGS gage number Parameter and range…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ranges and Units of Parameters for the Daily Water Balance Model (Kollat et al, 2012;Wang, 2018), and the Calibrated Parameter Values for 12 Selected Catchments (Locations Shown in Figure 10) Index USGS gage number Parameter and range…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model structure and parameterization of both HSC and TOPMODEL are simple, but not oversimplified, as they capture likely the most dominant factor controlling runoff generation, i.e., the spatial heterogeneity of storage capacity. Hence, this study also sheds light on the possibility of moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity (McDonnell et al, 2007), to simplify them into a succinct and a priori curve by taking advantage of catchment self-organization probably caused by co-evolution (Wang and Tang, 2014) or the principle of maximum entropy production (Kleidon and Lorenz, 2004).…”
Section: Catchment Heterogeneity and Simple Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Performing a synthesis on how the spatio-temporal variability of land-surface fluxes -runoff, evapotranspiration, net radiation, and hydrologic flow alteration -differ globally in natural and human-altered watersheds is a critical need to enable a complete understanding of global hydroclimate during the Anthropocene. The Budyko framework provides an ideal approach for such inquiry, because it has been used to decompose changes in observed land-surface fluxes due to both natural variability and human influence (e.g., Roderick and Farquhar, 2011;Wang and Hejazi, 2011;Yang et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Budyko Framework For the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of mean annual potential evapotranspiration (PET, demand) to mean annual precipitation (P , supply) explains the ratio of mean annual evapotranspiration (ET, actual) and P , and the data points are from GLDAS-2 estimates (Rodell et al, 2004) Modeling infiltration in the Budyko supply and demand framework: the ratio of infiltration (actual) and rainfall depth is a function of the ratio of infiltration capacity (demand) and rainfall depth (supply) as well as the initial soil moisture condition represented by the degree of saturation (ψ) (reproduced from Wang, 2018). Figure 3 represents the initial soil moisture condition by the degree of saturation, ψ, which is defined as the ratio of initial soil water storage and storage capacity (Wang, 2018). For a dry soil with low ψ, infiltration is expected to be higher with lower surface runoff potential.…”
Section: Extension Of Budyko's "Supply and Demand" Concept For Infiltmentioning
confidence: 99%