2022
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac180
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new prediction model for ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Abstract: Aims Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). We aimed to develop a model for individualized prediction of incident VA/SCD in ARVC patients. Methods and results Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a definite diagnosis and no history of sustained VAs/SCD at baseline, aged 38.2 ± 15.5 years, 44.7% male, were enrolle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
68
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 7% of data were missing and as described previously assumed to be at random and imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations. 8 The Cox model linearity assumption of continuous variables was evaluated using martingale residuals. Possible interactions of exercise with sex, age, and genetic variants were tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In total, 7% of data were missing and as described previously assumed to be at random and imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations. 8 The Cox model linearity assumption of continuous variables was evaluated using martingale residuals. Possible interactions of exercise with sex, age, and genetic variants were tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with ARVC with a substantial exercise participation history (ie, athletes) are at higher risk of sustained VA. 6,7,10 But the risk calculator for incident sustained VA (arvcrisk.com) does not specifically include an exercise metric. 8 This possible limitation has raised concerns about the validity of its predictions in athletes. 9 Reassuringly, Gasperetti et al 14 recently validated the risk calculator in a cohort of 25 Italian athletes (defined as those practicing >6 hours per week of >6 MET activities during the past 3 years) showing the risk calculator predictions to be accurate.…”
Section: Exercise In Personalized Risk Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arrhythmia risk stratification for at-risk family members of patients with ARVC is a challenging scenario for clinicians given the possibility of sudden cardiac death as the presenting symptom and the possibility of implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation for primary prevention in high-risk patients. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in patients with ARVC identified risk factors for VA in diagnosed patients with ARVC, 56 which was successfully used to inform development of a model to predict personalized risk of incident sustained VA. 57 Although recent guidelines recommend the use of device therapy based on overall attributable risk in an individual, similar strategies to predict ARVC onset and risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in at-risk relatives have the potential to promote individualized management of this unique group of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach has been adopted previously in a large cohort of 528 ARVC/D patients to predict the long-term risk of ventricular arrhythmias. The model constructed, which included age, male gender, cardiac syncope in the prior 6 months, prior non-sustained VT, number of PVCs in 24 h, number of leads with TWI and right ventricular ejection fraction, demonstrated an improved ability to estimate risk of ventricular arrhythmias and guide decision-making in ICD implantation for such patients [41]. A meta-analysis identified the following 11 variables as the most important factor for predicting arrhythmic events: (1) male gender, (2) presyncope, (3) left ventricular dysfunction, (4) TWI in inferior leads, (5) proband status, (6) late potentials, (7) syncope, (8) inducibility at electrophysiological study, (9) right ventricular dysfunction, (10) epsilon waves, and (11) premature ventricular contractions greater than 1000/24 h [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%