“…Given the high incidence of 68.5% in tibial plateau fractures involving the posterior column and plenty of important anatomical structures locating in the posterolateral site of the knee, how to manage the posterolateral column remains a big challenge in clinical practice. The PRLA was designed, unlike early ones [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], not only for the management of posterior (both posteromedial and posterolateral) tibial plateau fractures but also, while combined with the anterolateral approach, all the three columns of tibial plateau could be exposed as a whole. For the posterolateral fragments management, the advantages and disadvantages of the PRLA had been discussed in early studies [5,7,25].…”