2009
DOI: 10.1671/039.029.0307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new pliocene dolphin (Cetacea: Pontoporiidae), from the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Geisler et al (2011) used a combined morphological and molecular analysis to clarify the relationships among extant and fossil lineages of cetaceans, with mostly a focus on odontocetes, including some important fossil taxa, but taxon sampling within Inioidea was relatively sparse compared to Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert (2012) . This latter work, which described Meherinnia isoni Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert, 2012 , a late Miocene inioid from marine rocks of North Carolina, USA, also included other fossil inioids such as Auroracetus bakerae Gibson & Geisler, 2009 , Ischyrorhynchus vanbenedeni Ameghino, 1891 , Protophocaena minima , and Stenasodelphis russellae Godfrey & Barnes, 2008 , some of which were not included in subsequent phylogenetic analyses of odontocetes, such as the one by Murakami et al (2014) . The starting point for our analysis was the matrix provided by Aguirre-Fernández & Fordyce (2014) in their description of the early Miocene stem odontocete Papahu taitapu Aguirre-Fernández & Fordyce, 2014 , which used the morphological partition of Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert (2012) in their description of Meherrinia , along with some important modifications (e.g., the removal of Mysticeti and unpublished specimens, and coding revisions for select stem odontocetes) that enhanced its utility for resolving fossil and living odontocete relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Geisler et al (2011) used a combined morphological and molecular analysis to clarify the relationships among extant and fossil lineages of cetaceans, with mostly a focus on odontocetes, including some important fossil taxa, but taxon sampling within Inioidea was relatively sparse compared to Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert (2012) . This latter work, which described Meherinnia isoni Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert, 2012 , a late Miocene inioid from marine rocks of North Carolina, USA, also included other fossil inioids such as Auroracetus bakerae Gibson & Geisler, 2009 , Ischyrorhynchus vanbenedeni Ameghino, 1891 , Protophocaena minima , and Stenasodelphis russellae Godfrey & Barnes, 2008 , some of which were not included in subsequent phylogenetic analyses of odontocetes, such as the one by Murakami et al (2014) . The starting point for our analysis was the matrix provided by Aguirre-Fernández & Fordyce (2014) in their description of the early Miocene stem odontocete Papahu taitapu Aguirre-Fernández & Fordyce, 2014 , which used the morphological partition of Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert (2012) in their description of Meherrinia , along with some important modifications (e.g., the removal of Mysticeti and unpublished specimens, and coding revisions for select stem odontocetes) that enhanced its utility for resolving fossil and living odontocete relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). Fossil pontoporiids have been described from shallow marine and estuarine strata of early late Miocene to Early Pliocene age from the Atlantic coast of North America, including Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida ( Morgan, 1994 ; Whitmore, 1994 ; Godfrey & Barnes, 2008 ; Gibson & Geisler, 2009 ; Geisler, Godfrey & Lambert, 2012 ). Along the Atlantic coast of Europe, Protophocaena minima Abel, 1905 from shallow marine Miocene of the Netherlands, is now recognized as a pontoporiid ( Lambert & Post, 2005 ) based on additional cranial and periotic material from the Miocene of Belgium and the Netherlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some extinct and extant freshwater species are recorded among Iniidae ( Cozzuol, 2010 ; Gutstein, Cozzuol & Pyenson, 2014 ), all inioids attributed to the family Pontoporiidae are reported from marine environments. To date the following pontoporiid genera are recognised: the extinct Auroracetus , Brachydelphis , Pliopontos , Pontistes , Protophocaena , and Stenasodelphis , and the extant Pontoporia , ( Burmeister, 1885 ; Muizon, 1984 ; Muizon, 1988b ; Lambert & Post, 2005 ; Godfrey & Barnes, 2008 ; Gibson & Geisler, 2009 ; Lambert & Muizon, 2013 ). The anatomy of Pontoporia blainvillei , from the coastal waters of eastern South America is known in detail ( Flower, 1867 ; Brownell Jr, 1989 ), and cranial and some postcranial remains of Brachydelphis and Pliopontos , from the southeast Pacific, are also well described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Inia and Pontoporia , two endemic and exclusively South American genera that are sister taxa (forming the clade Inioidea sensu Muizon ), possess a comparatively rich fossil record (Fordyce and Barnes, ; Fordyce et al, ; Messenger and McGuire, ; Cozzuol, ). Fossil pontoporiids have been identified in Neogene marine deposits in both the Southern and Northern hemispheres (Muizon, , ; Lambert and Post, ; Pyenson and Hoch, ; Godfrey and Barnes, ; Gibson and Geisler, ; Gutstein et al, ; Lambert and Muizon, ). Fossil Iniidae, by contrast, appear restricted mostly to South America, with work by Cozzuol (, , ), Muizon (, ), Cozzuol and da Silva (), recognizing three fossil genera in South America (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%