1985
DOI: 10.2307/3793352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Phomopsis Species from Soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
59
1
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, isolates from the second group never formed perithecia. These isolates differed from Lehman's description of P. sojae, and from the isolates in the first group, in the shape of the pycnidial locule, the morphology of the conidiomata, the size and shape of the stromata, and in the conidiophore morphology (Hobbs et al, 1985). Hobbs et al (1985) pointed out that isolates similar to the second group might have been observed in the past, but were probably reported as D. phaseolorum var.…”
Section: Discovery and Description Of Phomopsis Longicollacontrasting
confidence: 38%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, isolates from the second group never formed perithecia. These isolates differed from Lehman's description of P. sojae, and from the isolates in the first group, in the shape of the pycnidial locule, the morphology of the conidiomata, the size and shape of the stromata, and in the conidiophore morphology (Hobbs et al, 1985). Hobbs et al (1985) pointed out that isolates similar to the second group might have been observed in the past, but were probably reported as D. phaseolorum var.…”
Section: Discovery and Description Of Phomopsis Longicollacontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…P. longicolla differs from others in the Diaporthe -Phomopsis complex in its morphology. It also does not have a known teleomorph (Hobbs et al, 1985). Although other Diaporthe and Phomopsis spp.…”
Section: The Causal Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations