2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Pd(II) complex of a sulfur ylide; Synthesis, X-ray characterization, theoretical study and catalytic activity toward the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometries of the aforementioned Pt(II) complexes were fully optimized at BP86/def2‐SVP level of theory. It has been shown that BP86 is a suitable level for calculation of bonding situation between the M ← L in such as these complexes . All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 set of programs .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The geometries of the aforementioned Pt(II) complexes were fully optimized at BP86/def2‐SVP level of theory. It has been shown that BP86 is a suitable level for calculation of bonding situation between the M ← L in such as these complexes . All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 set of programs .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It has been shown that BP86 is a suitable level for the calculation of the bonding situation between the M ← L in complexes such as these [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Vibrational frequency analyses, done at the same level of theory, indicated that the optimized structures are at the stationary points corresponding to the local minima without any imaginary frequency.…”
Section: Computational Details (Theoretical Studies)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morokuma and Ziegler and Rauk developed EDA in the 1970s. Using this technique, a quantitative computational pattern is in hand for the explanation of the strength of M ← L σ donation, and M → L back‐bonding in main group and transition metal complexes with different types of ligands …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 set of programs . It has been shown in former studies that BP86 is a suitable level for calculation of the bonding situation of M ← L in such as these complexes . For bonding analyses, the terms of EDA were carried out at BP86/TZ2P(ZORA)//BP86/def2‐SVP with C1 symmetry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%