2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new open boundary formulation for incompressible SPH

Abstract: International audienceIn this work a new formulation for inflow/outflow boundary conditions in an incompressible Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics (ISPH) model is proposed. It relies on the technique of unified semi-analytical boundary conditions that was first proposed for wall boundary conditions in 2013, then extended to open boundaries in the framework of weakly-compressible SPH (WCSPH). An ISPH model relying on that formulation for solid boundaries was then proposed, which is the one considered here. It in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an advantage of particle-based methods which automatically resolve the conservation of mass as well as explicit capturing of the interface between different material phases. SPH has been applied to a wide range of applications such as free surface flows (Löhner et al 2006;Leroy et al 2016;Gotoh et al 2014), hydrodynamic instabilities (Rahmat et al 2014;, multi-phase flows (Rahmat et al 2016;Szewc et al 2013;Colagrossi and Landrini 2003), bluff body simulations and Fluid-Solid Interactions (Rafiee and Thiagarajan 2009;Yang et al 2014).…”
Section: The Sph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an advantage of particle-based methods which automatically resolve the conservation of mass as well as explicit capturing of the interface between different material phases. SPH has been applied to a wide range of applications such as free surface flows (Löhner et al 2006;Leroy et al 2016;Gotoh et al 2014), hydrodynamic instabilities (Rahmat et al 2014;, multi-phase flows (Rahmat et al 2016;Szewc et al 2013;Colagrossi and Landrini 2003), bluff body simulations and Fluid-Solid Interactions (Rafiee and Thiagarajan 2009;Yang et al 2014).…”
Section: The Sph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of open boundary approaches are available in SPH, among which the unified semianalytical model [52][53][54], the mirror particles method [55], and the buffer region strategy, originally introduced by Lastiwka et al [56], then used in many other works [57][58][59][60]. The latter approach has been chosen for implementation in DualSPHysics, mainly for its simplicity but also for its suitability to a variety of engineering applications.…”
Section: Open Boundaries (Inlet and Outlet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While very accurate, these approaches are quite restrictive in that mathematical derivations are kernel dependent, restricting generality of application. Nevertheless, the accuracy offered is attractive and recent works have applied the semi-analytical approach to open as well as solid boundaries in weakly compressible [62] and incompressible [63] flows. Open boundaries in coastal and offshore applications will invariably contain a free surface, and it is here that one has to return to fully numerical (rather than semi-analytical) approaches.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%