2014
DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v97i4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Numerical Integrator for the Solution of General Second Order Ordinary Differential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
11
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1] we compared our method with the existing methods like the block and block predictor-corrector and the results re-affirms the claim of [10] that though block predictor-corrector method takes longer time to implement, it gives better approximation than the block method. In this paper we extended the step length considered in [1] and considered varying the number of interpolation points to observe the effect on the performance of the method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [1] we compared our method with the existing methods like the block and block predictor-corrector and the results re-affirms the claim of [10] that though block predictor-corrector method takes longer time to implement, it gives better approximation than the block method. In this paper we extended the step length considered in [1] and considered varying the number of interpolation points to observe the effect on the performance of the method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Also vital to this paper is the concept of block predictor-corrector method (Milne approach). This method formed a bridge between the predictor-corrector method and block method [4] [10] [13]. In [1] we stated that results generated at an overlapping interval affect the accuracy of the method and the nature of the model cannot be determined at the selected grid points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these models do not always have theoretical solutions, thus numerical methods are often employed to solve them. Researchers in most cases always use method of reduction of higher order ODEs into system of first order ODEs to solve (1). This technique though quite good, is bedeviled with many problems such tediousness, complexity of the method, waste of time, and the need for large computer storage memories because of too many auxiliary functions, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, higher order ordinary differential equations are solved directly by the predictorcorrector method where separate predictors are developed to implement the corrector and Taylor series expansion adopted to provide the starting values. Predictor-corrector methods are extensively studied by [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These authors proposed linear multistep methods with continuous coefficient, which have advantage of evaluation at all points within the grid over the proposed method in [4] The major setbacks of predictor-corrector method are extensively discussed by [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, considerable attention has been devoted to solving ordinary differential equation of higher order directly without reduction for instance: methods of linear multistep method (LMM) were considered by Lambert and Watson [8], Dormand and El-Mikkawy [9], El-Mikkawy and ElDesouky [10] and Awoyemi [11] [12] [13] [14]. Subsequently, LMM was independently proposed by Kayode [15], Onumanyi et al [16] and Adesanya et al [17] in the predictor-corrector mode, based on collocation method. These authors proposed LMM with continuous coefficients where they adopted Taylor series algorithm to supply the starting values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%