2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability 2012
DOI: 10.1109/sere.2012.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Non-Intrusive Authentication Method Based on the Orientation Sensor for Smartphone Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, when there are obstacles during the scanning process, the decision on recognition may be disrupted. In general, the direction of movement is detected by the magnetometer, while the gait recognition is detected by the gyroscopic sensor and accelerometer [33,34]. For verification purposes, these authors used the same classifier, which is the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN).…”
Section: Physical Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, when there are obstacles during the scanning process, the decision on recognition may be disrupted. In general, the direction of movement is detected by the magnetometer, while the gait recognition is detected by the gyroscopic sensor and accelerometer [33,34]. For verification purposes, these authors used the same classifier, which is the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN).…”
Section: Physical Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors conclude that the non-intrusive mechanism can be used with the intrusive mechanism. For example, PIN or Password can be used with the biometric (finger-prints) to increase the security of smartphones [25].…”
Section: A Authentication In Smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average response was 3.2, with a smaller standard deviation than the previous Authors URR AAR anomaly detection De Luca et al [21] 19% 21% yes Feng et al [24] 18.92% 14.02% no Lin et al [52] 6.85% 6.85% no Bo et al [10] 27.64% 24.99% yes Frank et al [27] 13% 13% no Our Work 21% 20% yes Table 6.9: Results in the Literature question. The users also considered swipes to be slightly less obtrusive than PINs (2.5 response on average).…”
Section: Comparisons To Pin Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Out of the authors discussed in the background section, there are five authors who evaluate a scheme based in some way on touch screen input. These authors are given in As stated above, Feng [24], Lin [52] and Frank [27] report results for a single touch action, however only under binary classification and without considering informed attackers. These results are better for both AAR and URR than our own, however that is not surprising given knowledge of the attacker's swipes.…”
Section: Comparison To Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation