2019
DOI: 10.1127/ejm/2019/0031-2874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new nomenclature scheme for the alluaudite supergroup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although from a didactical and historical viewpoint it is practical to classify mineral species first into classes, this approach seems to be inconsistent with the present list of the supergroups, either approved by the IMA-CNMNC or established following Mills et al [6]: alluaudite [25], alunite [26], amphibole [5], apatite [27], arctite [28], astrophyllite [29], betpakdalite [30], brackebuschite [31], dumortierite [32], epidote [33], gadolinite [34], garnet [9], gatelite [35], högbomite [36], hollandite [37], hydrotalcite [38], labuntsovite [39], laueite [40], lindackerite [41], lovozerite [42], mayenite [43], perovskite [44], pharmacosiderite [45], pyrochlore [23], sapphirine [46], seidozerite [47], spinel [4], tobermorite [48], and tourmaline [21]. We can note that 15 out of the 29 approved supergroups (hence more than 50%) include mineral species with different anions or anionic complexes: alunite, apatite, arctite, brackebuschite, dumortierite, gadolinite, garnet, hydrotalcite, mayenite, perovskite, pharmacosiderite, sapphirine, seidozerite, spinel, and tourmaline.…”
Section: One Note On the Mineral Classification Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although from a didactical and historical viewpoint it is practical to classify mineral species first into classes, this approach seems to be inconsistent with the present list of the supergroups, either approved by the IMA-CNMNC or established following Mills et al [6]: alluaudite [25], alunite [26], amphibole [5], apatite [27], arctite [28], astrophyllite [29], betpakdalite [30], brackebuschite [31], dumortierite [32], epidote [33], gadolinite [34], garnet [9], gatelite [35], högbomite [36], hollandite [37], hydrotalcite [38], labuntsovite [39], laueite [40], lindackerite [41], lovozerite [42], mayenite [43], perovskite [44], pharmacosiderite [45], pyrochlore [23], sapphirine [46], seidozerite [47], spinel [4], tobermorite [48], and tourmaline [21]. We can note that 15 out of the 29 approved supergroups (hence more than 50%) include mineral species with different anions or anionic complexes: alunite, apatite, arctite, brackebuschite, dumortierite, gadolinite, garnet, hydrotalcite, mayenite, perovskite, pharmacosiderite, sapphirine, seidozerite, spinel, and tourmaline.…”
Section: One Note On the Mineral Classification Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structure of badalovite ( Fig. 5a), like structures of other members of the alluaudite group (Moore, 1971;Moore and Ito, 1979;Krivovichev et al, 2013;Hatert, (Fig. 5b) and the fourth vertex with the octahedron of adjacent layer, thus linking the layers to a three-dimensional Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Different coloured samples of badalovite were found to have close chemical composition ( (Hatert, 2019), is NaNaMg(MgFe 3+ ) (AsO 4 ) 3 .…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moore and Ito (1979) introduced a nomenclature for the minerals of the alluaudite and wyllieite groups. Recently, a new nomenclature of the alluaudite supergroup, which contains totally 16 phosphate and 19 arsenate minerals by 2019, has been presented by Hatert (2019). Khorari et al (1997) examined the compositional relations between the alluaudite and garnet structures and revealed that the alluaudite structure, like the garnet structure, is extremely chemically compliant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%