2013
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2013.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new mutation in the C-SH2 domain of PTPN11 causes Noonan syndrome with multiple giant cell lesions

Abstract: Noonan syndrome (NS), an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder, is caused by the dysregulation of the RAS-MAPK pathway and is characterized by short stature, heart defects, pectus excavatum, webbed neck, learning problems, cryptorchidism and facial dysmorphism. We here present the clinical and molecular characterization of a family with NS and multiple giant cell lesions (MGCLs). The proband is a 12-year-old girl with NS and MGCL. Her mother shows typical NS without MGCL. Whole-exome sequencing of the girl, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Karbach et al (2012) noticed that individuals harboring variants in SOS1 were overrepresented in the group with GCL. Since their report, five other cases have been described in the literature (Carapito et al, 2014; Eyselbergs et al, 2014; Lutz et al, 2020; Rodríguez, Castellón, Moreno, Paez, & Aracena Álvarez, 2020; Sinnott & Patel, 2018) and including the present data, there are 16 individuals with variants in PTPN11 and 15 individuals with variants in SOS1 , giving further support to the idea that individuals harboring variants in SOS1 could present a higher risk for the development of GCL compared with the ones with variants in PTPN11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Karbach et al (2012) noticed that individuals harboring variants in SOS1 were overrepresented in the group with GCL. Since their report, five other cases have been described in the literature (Carapito et al, 2014; Eyselbergs et al, 2014; Lutz et al, 2020; Rodríguez, Castellón, Moreno, Paez, & Aracena Álvarez, 2020; Sinnott & Patel, 2018) and including the present data, there are 16 individuals with variants in PTPN11 and 15 individuals with variants in SOS1 , giving further support to the idea that individuals harboring variants in SOS1 could present a higher risk for the development of GCL compared with the ones with variants in PTPN11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Karbach et al (2012) noticed that individuals harboring variants in SOS1 were overrepresented in the group with GCL. Since their report, five other cases have been described in the literature (Carapito et al, 2014;Eyselbergs et al, 2014;Lutz et al, 2020;Rodríguez, Castellón, Moreno, Paez, & Aracena Alvarez, 2020;Sinnott & Patel, 2018) and (Figure 3). Iliac bone lesions in NS are uncommon.…”
Section: Factors and Conditions Interfering In The Outcome In Rasopmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Exome sequencing was performed as previously described . An average of 8.9 Gb were mapped to the hg19 using Lifescope TM (LifeTechnologies TM ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WES approach enables studies of the patients within an environmental and clinical context through large-scale cohort trials and data processing with a focus on the associations among molecular biology, disease and health phenotypes to assure a more accurate diagnosis, leading to the establishment of individualized disease prevention and treatment programmes (Tetreault et al, 2015; Collins et al, 2016; Tebani et al, 2016). Moreover, WES has allowed the identification of new genes associated to the clinical description of patients with RASopathies (Niguidula et al, 2018; Matias et al, 2019), such as RIT1 (Aoki et al, 2013), A2ML1 (Vissers et al, 2015), RASA2, SPRY1 (Chen et al, 2014), SOS2, LZTR1 (Yamamoto et al, 2015; Umeki et al, 2019), PPP1CB (Gripp et al, 2016), CBL (Coe et al, 2017), and MRAS (Higgins et al, 2017), as well as new mutations in genes of the RAS/MAPK pathway (Carapito et al, 2014; Sana et al, 2016; Coe et al, 2017; Harms et al, 2018; Valera et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%