2008 Joint International Conference on Power System Technology and IEEE Power India Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icpst.2008.4745168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New modified bifilar Drive Circuit for Switched Reluctance Motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many potential converters exist for SRMs, including the asymmetric half bridge converter [20], the H-bridge converter [21], the magnetic type converter [22] and the dissipative converter amongst others [23]. The asymmetric half bridge converter is most commonly employed, exhibiting excellent phase independence at the expense of a large number of power electronic devices, requiring two switches and two diodes per phase [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many potential converters exist for SRMs, including the asymmetric half bridge converter [20], the H-bridge converter [21], the magnetic type converter [22] and the dissipative converter amongst others [23]. The asymmetric half bridge converter is most commonly employed, exhibiting excellent phase independence at the expense of a large number of power electronic devices, requiring two switches and two diodes per phase [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the alternatives, the H-bridge, bifilar, and dissipative converters each reduce the number of switches by half, but each has consequent drawbacks and limitations. The H-bridge converter is only suitable for four or multiples of four-phase machines [21]; the bifilar converter employs an extra inductance for each phase, which increases the converter cost and volume [22]; the dissipative converter employs extra resistance to absorb the energy stored in the phase winding, giving rise to reduced efficiency and limited scope of application [23]. Except all the conventional converters mentioned above, some application specific converter topologies for SRM are proposed [24][25][26], which can also be treated as the potential converters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the alternatives, the H‐bridge, bifilar, and dissipative converters each reduce the number of switches by half, but each has consequent drawbacks and limitations. The H‐bridge converter is only suitable for four or multiples of four‐phase machines [17]; the bifilar converter employs an extra inductance for each phase, which increases the converter cost and volume [18]; the dissipative converter employs extra resistance to absorb the energy stored in the phase winding, giving rise to reduced efficiency and limited scope of application [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%