2013
DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.32012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model to Study Healing of a Complex Femur Fracture with Concurrent Soft Tissue Injury in Sheep

Abstract: High energy bone fractures resulting from impact trauma are often accompanied by subcutaneous soft tissue injuries, even if the skin remains intact. There is evidence that such closed soft tissue injuries affect the healing of bone fractures, and vice versa. Despite this knowledge, most impact trauma studies in animals have focussed on bone fractures or soft tissue trauma in isolation. However, given the simultaneous impact on both tissues a better understanding of the interaction between these two injuries is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four weeks after fracture, the fractures in Group A were scarring and the bone was slightly atrophic (Figure 8). Group B (3 weeks postoperatively) showed bone callus bridging (Figure 9(a)) and new callus containing a rich and energetic cutting cone (osteoclast population) and closing cone (osteoblast population) extending in different directions 14 ; the cutting cone was destroying the sequestrum, trailing the closing cone directly into the bone (Figure 9(b) and (c)). At 8 weeks after fracture, the original bone in Group A was thinner and had been replaced by new bone, which was blocked by scar tissue and unable to extend to the contralateral and surrounding regions, and atrophic nonunion had formed (Figure 10).…”
Section: Histological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four weeks after fracture, the fractures in Group A were scarring and the bone was slightly atrophic (Figure 8). Group B (3 weeks postoperatively) showed bone callus bridging (Figure 9(a)) and new callus containing a rich and energetic cutting cone (osteoclast population) and closing cone (osteoblast population) extending in different directions 14 ; the cutting cone was destroying the sequestrum, trailing the closing cone directly into the bone (Figure 9(b) and (c)). At 8 weeks after fracture, the original bone in Group A was thinner and had been replaced by new bone, which was blocked by scar tissue and unable to extend to the contralateral and surrounding regions, and atrophic nonunion had formed (Figure 10).…”
Section: Histological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain studies have indicated that postfracture callus growth, which represents the bone healing capacity, is closely associated with damage to surrounding soft tissues 13 and that delayed union and nonunion caused by high-energy injury must be associated with even more severe soft tissue damage. 1,2,14 Severe soft tissue injury may lead to a greater local inflammatory response and poorer fracture healing. The physiological process of fracture healing is presently considered to involve benign inflammation caused by low-energy injury; [15][16][17] however, a model of bone fracture focusing on soft tissue damage and the inflammatory response has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%