2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model suite to determine the influence of cosmic rays on (exo)planetary atmospheric biosignatures

Abstract: Context. The first opportunity to detect indications for life outside the Solar System may be provided already within the next decade with upcoming missions such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) and/or the Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey (ARIEL) mission, searching for atmospheric biosignatures on planets in the habitable zone of cool K-and M-stars. Nevertheless, their harsh stellar radiation and particle environment could lead t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(191 reference statements)
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tropospheric values are set to constants based on the lowermost stratospheric values. Rates for H and N( 4 S) are similar to Earth-like values of 1 and 0.6 respectively (compare, e.g., Herbst et al 2019b;Sinnhuber et al 2012), while values, e.g., for NO and OH are different. The NO formation rate is smaller than on Earth (<0.5 compared to ∼0.58), with values for the 20% CO 2 atmosphere being smaller than for the 5% CO 2 case, indicating that this difference is due to the change in bulk atmosphere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tropospheric values are set to constants based on the lowermost stratospheric values. Rates for H and N( 4 S) are similar to Earth-like values of 1 and 0.6 respectively (compare, e.g., Herbst et al 2019b;Sinnhuber et al 2012), while values, e.g., for NO and OH are different. The NO formation rate is smaller than on Earth (<0.5 compared to ∼0.58), with values for the 20% CO 2 atmosphere being smaller than for the 5% CO 2 case, indicating that this difference is due to the change in bulk atmosphere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We performed a habitability study of Prox Cen b assuming an Earth-like atmosphere, focusing on the influence of SEPs from stellar flares upon spectral transmission features. We applied our extensive model suite discussed in Herbst et al (2019b), which includes: the calculation of SEP fluxes and spectral energy distributions; their precipitation through a planetary magnetosphere and atmosphere; cosmic-ray-induced atmospheric ionization; ion redistribution within the atmosphere; and atmospheric climate and neutral composition. Our results suggest a few words of caution for the analysis of spectra from future observations of such planets around M-dwarf stars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Atmospheric ionization rates are transferred to ions per cm -3 s -1 on a geopotential altitude grid and scaled with a constant factor 10 11 leading to maximal ionization rates of slightly above 10 4 cm -3 s -1 for the exponential power spectrum with characteristic energy of 3 MeV. Model calculations with the 1D stacked box model of the neutral and charged atmosphere ExoTIC [20] are carried out starting from a base neutral atmospheric composition provided by the HAMMONIA chemistry climate model for local noon on December 13, 2009 at 53°N/0°E, with a constant ionization rate forcing for one hour from 4-5 pm. Results at the end of the ionization period are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Impact On Neutral Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%