2010
DOI: 10.1108/10748121011082626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model for financing public colleges and universities

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to suggest public service corporations as a new means of helping to finance comprehensive public colleges and universities based on a well-documented assumption that the current shared responsibility for financing public colleges is broken. Design/methodology/approach-The paper focuses on financing comprehensive public colleges and universities, and explicitly does not focus on research, community, or proprietary institutions. The paper draws heavily from national data and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experiments in autonomy can succeed. For example, New Jersey granted its state colleges and universities the autonomy to set tuition and fees and to conduct academic and business affairs with significantly less state involvement under statutory changes in 1986 and 1994 (Greer 1998; Greer and Klein 2010). Since then, New Jersey’s state colleges and universities have become among the nation’s most productive public institutions of higher education, ranking first in the United States in the number of bachelor degrees produced relative to the state’s total funding per FTE; third in six-year graduation rates relative to total funding per FTE; and the third overall “most productive” set of public baccalaureate and master’s institutions in the country (Kelly and Jones 2007).…”
Section: Implications For Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments in autonomy can succeed. For example, New Jersey granted its state colleges and universities the autonomy to set tuition and fees and to conduct academic and business affairs with significantly less state involvement under statutory changes in 1986 and 1994 (Greer 1998; Greer and Klein 2010). Since then, New Jersey’s state colleges and universities have become among the nation’s most productive public institutions of higher education, ranking first in the United States in the number of bachelor degrees produced relative to the state’s total funding per FTE; third in six-year graduation rates relative to total funding per FTE; and the third overall “most productive” set of public baccalaureate and master’s institutions in the country (Kelly and Jones 2007).…”
Section: Implications For Public Policymentioning
confidence: 99%