1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)94977-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model for calculating atomic charges in molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
394
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 523 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
394
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first experiment, the ligand was docked using AutoDock with Gasteiger 49 (i.e., default) charges for both the ligand and the receptor. In a second experiment, Gasteiger charges were used for the ligand, and potential-derived charges on the receptor were taken from the AMBER force field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first experiment, the ligand was docked using AutoDock with Gasteiger 49 (i.e., default) charges for both the ligand and the receptor. In a second experiment, Gasteiger charges were used for the ligand, and potential-derived charges on the receptor were taken from the AMBER force field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was initially generated in a reasonable low energy conformation using Concord (45,46), a program widely used to generate three-dimensional structures. This model was then optimized by energy minimization using the Sybyl 6.6 Tripos force field with atomic charges calculated by the method of Gasteiger-Hü ckel (47)(48)(49). The molecular surface was visualized as a Connolly dot surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse kinds of bond weights (w i ) can be used to encode information related to each bond in the molecule. These bond labels are chemically meaningful numbers such as standard bond distances [68, 105 -107] and standard bond dipoles [68, 105 -107], or even mathematical expressions involving atomic weights such as atomic log P [108], surface area contributions of polar atoms [109], atomic molar refractivities [110], atomic hybrid polarizabilities [111], Gasteiger -Marsilli atomic charges [112], atomic electronegativities in Paulings scale [113] and so on. Here we characterized each bond with the following parameter:…”
Section: Chemical Information and Bond-based Molecular Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%