2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2005.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new mixed integer programming formulation for facility layout design using flexible bays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
56
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The creation of bays in the layout plan helps in the design of proper aisle structure on the shop floor, which in turn facilitates easy movement of material handling equipment on the shop floor. Hence, Konak et al (2006) argued that the recent works on unequal area facility layout problems consider the Flexible Bay Structure (FBS) for the facility layout design. Tate and Smith (1995) published a key paper on FBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation of bays in the layout plan helps in the design of proper aisle structure on the shop floor, which in turn facilitates easy movement of material handling equipment on the shop floor. Hence, Konak et al (2006) argued that the recent works on unequal area facility layout problems consider the Flexible Bay Structure (FBS) for the facility layout design. Tate and Smith (1995) published a key paper on FBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexible bay structure (FBS) layout is a continuous layout representation allowing the departments to be located only in parallel bays with varying widths, and the width of each bay depends on the total area of the departments in the bay [9]. Flexible bay layout problem (FBLP) was first studied by [25], and since then, it has been extensively studied, (e.g., [24,5,14,7,27,12,11,10,26,13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heragu & Kusiak (1991) developed a special case of the FLP, where the length, width, and orientation of the department are known in advance. Exact solution methods based on MIP up to now cannot solve large FLP problems (more than nine departments) in a reasonable time (Konak et al, 2006). From the other side, the QAP can solve the larger size problems, by assuming that all departments are equal-sized and must be allocated to the predetermined locations (candidate points), nevertheless QAP cannot solve large scale problems optimally in a polynomial time when the departments size is above 15 facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%