1993
DOI: 10.1016/0141-6359(93)90275-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new minimum zone method for evaluating flatness errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A minimum zone method [15,16] is modified and employed to find the axis of a cone that is much closer to the minimum circumscribed cone. The detail will be introduced briefly as follows:…”
Section: Procedures For Determining the Reference Axis Of A Minimum CImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A minimum zone method [15,16] is modified and employed to find the axis of a cone that is much closer to the minimum circumscribed cone. The detail will be introduced briefly as follows:…”
Section: Procedures For Determining the Reference Axis Of A Minimum CImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a simplex search method was used to search for the axial direction that minimises the circularity error. Huang et al [15,16] also developed two techniques called CLRS and CPRS for straightness and flatness evaluation based on their work on the geometric minimum zone criteria. Chatterjee and Roth [17] used the simplex method to search for the vertex location, which minimised the Chebychev width while obtaining the minimum zone cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, much research has been devoted to finding the minimum zone solutions for straightness error and other form errors using a variety of methods. Some researchers applied the numerical methods of linear programming [3,4,5], such as the Monte Carlo method, the simplex search, spiral search, and the minimax approximation algorithm etc. Another approach has been to find the enclosing polygon for the minimum zone solution, such as the eigen-polyhedral method, the convex polygon method, and the convex hall theory etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kanada and Suzuki [8,9] discussed the application of several computing techniques, such as the Nelder-Mead simplex method, QIM method, GSM method, TKM method, and TQM method for straightness and flatness evaluation. Huang et al [10,11] developed a technique called CLRS and CPRS for straightness and flatness evaluation based on the geometric minimum zone criteria. This technique searched for 2-1 or 1-2 models for straightness evaluation, and 2-2 and 3-1 models for flatness evaluation based on a concept of rotating schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%