2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2016.7485157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new MIMO clutter model for cognitive radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to overcome the trade-off between angular resolution and aperture size, the large number of proposed approaches can be categorized majorly into: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) radar. While SAR approaches exploit the physical motion of the radar platform to span up a synthetic antenna array [2], MIMO approaches exploit the diversity offered by different antenna elements [3], [4]. Since SAR approaches work well only when the radar platform trajectory is precisely measured using another sensor [2], we focus on MIMO approaches, where imaging and classification can be performed with a standalone radar system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to overcome the trade-off between angular resolution and aperture size, the large number of proposed approaches can be categorized majorly into: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) radar. While SAR approaches exploit the physical motion of the radar platform to span up a synthetic antenna array [2], MIMO approaches exploit the diversity offered by different antenna elements [3], [4]. Since SAR approaches work well only when the radar platform trajectory is precisely measured using another sensor [2], we focus on MIMO approaches, where imaging and classification can be performed with a standalone radar system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though other clutter sources exist, like large discrete objects, vegetation, and targets not currently being surveilled, the specific stochastic model we apply here only concerns ground clutter. However, we note that a later formulation in this paper may be amenable to considering those other sources in a manner that recalls efforts in the literature on channel estimation (see, for example, [16]). For now, let us assume we have a number of clutter patches (say, Q) each comprising P distinct scatterers.…”
Section: Stap Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest of the paper continues as follows: First, we will outline the general signal model and relate it to the work on transfer functions by [16]. Next, we will define the joint design problem and demonstrate, after some transformation, that the problem is non-convex unless all clutter patches are known to be nulled a priori.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with random fluctuations of spectrum width, these characteristics give the spectra a temporal and spatial variability. In [3], unlike traditional signal-dependent stochastic models, a new "stochastic transfer function" approach is presented that results from a fundamental physics scattering model. In [4], the authors propose a new method of modeling and simulation of temporal-spatial-correlated (TPC) clutter, based on the weighted norm in discrete complex linear space and a simple matrix transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%