2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new methodology for rapid detection of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus based on multiplex PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, several polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular methods have been presented with the power to detect, identify, and distinguish the microorganisms of interest among closely related species and strains [ 18 ]. For example, multiplex PCR assays have been developed for accurate and efficient detection of specific LAB strains in probiotic products [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The design of strain specific primers was performed by comparative sequence analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, several polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular methods have been presented with the power to detect, identify, and distinguish the microorganisms of interest among closely related species and strains [ 18 ]. For example, multiplex PCR assays have been developed for accurate and efficient detection of specific LAB strains in probiotic products [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The design of strain specific primers was performed by comparative sequence analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus in food products have been demonstrated (Karapetsas et al, 2010;Nikolaou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, genes such as 16S rRNA, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region, and the elongation factor Tu (tuf) gene have been used to distinguish microorganisms at the species or subspecies level [4,9,[26][27][28][29]. However, some studies have reported that these genes share high sequence similarities without showing sufficient variabilities to allow for the differentiation between L. delbrueckii subspecies [4,13]. In contrast, we selected genetic markers specific to the genomes of each subspecies using pangenome analysis.…”
Section: Genetic Marker Specificity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular-based methods for the identification and typing of lactic acid bacteria have been reported, including amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH), multi-locus sequence analysis (MLST), and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [6,[10][11][12]. However, these techniques are labor-intensive, expensive, and time-consuming with low reproducibility whereas PCR-based methods are rapid, sensitive, and reliable for identifying lactic acid bacteria [4]. Of these methods, genetic markers such as the 16S rRNA gene and 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region have been used to distinguish L. delbrueckii used in PCR-based methods [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%