2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method to remove random-valued impulse noise in images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different researchers [6,17] have proposed different constant values to decrease the threshold value. Basically, this value depends on their proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Different researchers [6,17] have proposed different constant values to decrease the threshold value. Basically, this value depends on their proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the validation of our proposed method to remove RVIN, we performed a comparison with the state-of-the-art RVIN de-noising algorithms based on the median value MF [11], AMF [8], DBA [15], DWM [6], ASWM [1], SN [17], FIDRM [13], and FRINRM [14] methods, with their proposed threshold and window sizes. A number of experiments were conducted using different window sizes (3×3, 5×5, 7×7, and 9 × 9) to determine the best window size for the identification and removal of RVIN for the proposed method, and 5 × 5 was found to be the best size of the sliding window for the noise identification and removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations