2020
DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method to quantify penile erection hardness: real-time ultrasonic shear wave elastography

Abstract: Background: An important indicator of penile erectile function is erection hardness (EH), which is currently evaluated by the semi-quantitative erectile hardness score (EHS). EH increases continuously during the course of an erection, so although it is statistically a continuous variable, the EHS is a grade variable. We propose a new method for real-time quantitative measurement of penile EH using ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE). Methods: The study group comprised 40 patients with erectile dysfunction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results in the previously mentioned aspect go down the same track of Hao et al (Cheng et al, 2020) as they reported higher elastography results in their evaluation of erection hardness in patients with ED than in healthy controls and stated 13 and 10 kpasc for each group during the resting phase respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results in the previously mentioned aspect go down the same track of Hao et al (Cheng et al, 2020) as they reported higher elastography results in their evaluation of erection hardness in patients with ED than in healthy controls and stated 13 and 10 kpasc for each group during the resting phase respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results in the previously mentioned aspect go down the same track of Hao et al (Cheng et al, 2020) as they reported higher elastography results in their evaluation of erection hardness in patients with ED than in healthy controls and stated 13 and 10 kpasc for each group during the resting phase respectively. Also, our data are in line with Inci et al in their correlation between age and SWE as higher values were in the older age group who expected to have higher cavernosal insults (Inci et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We speculated that the blood supply from the cavernous artery in the flaccid state was the main factor influencing the SWE value in AED and healthy subjects. A study evaluating the relationship between the SWE value of CCP and the erectile hardness demonstrated that the value of SWE (12.90 ± 2.06 kPa) in ED patients was higher than that (9.82 ± 1.92 kPa) in normal controls (Cheng et al., 2020). Its conclusions were consistent with our study, but it cannot divide ED into different original.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if we take a look at further concrete applications that will surely find space in the not too distant future, there are the use of PU as a follow-up tool for patients with vasculogenic ED treated with LiST [12] and then the application of ultrasonic shear wave elastography as potential reliable and objective clinical imaging index indicator for evaluating penile hardness [13].…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%