2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14184486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method to Evaluate Gold Mineralisation-Potential Mapping Using Deep Learning and an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Model

Abstract: Geoscientists have extensively used machine learning for geological mapping and exploring the mineral prospect of a province. However, the interpretation of results becomes challenging due to the complexity of machine learning models. This study uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) to estimate potential locations for gold mineralisation in Rengali Province, a tectonised mosaic of volcano-sedimentary sequences juxtaposed at the interface of the Archaean cratonic segm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pradhan et al. (2023) used CNN models to detect flood‐prone areas in Jinju Province, South Korea. The results showed acceptable predictive performance of model with the accuracy of 88.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pradhan et al. (2023) used CNN models to detect flood‐prone areas in Jinju Province, South Korea. The results showed acceptable predictive performance of model with the accuracy of 88.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explainability of ML models comes under explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) which demonstrates the importance of conditioning factors to overall predicted results, allowing the analyst to determine what the ML model considers when assessing flood susceptibility (Aydin & Iban, 2022; Pradhan et al, 2023). In this study, a local XAI approach namely shapley additive explanation (SHAP) technique is employed to gain insights into the primary factors that influence predictions and their impact on individual predictions (sample‐wise scale).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, statistical indices such as F1‐score, kappa coefficient and area under curve (AUC), were used to evaluate the model performances, which are widely used in geohazard modeling studies (Pradhan et al, 2023; Seleem et al, 2022; Zhao et al, 2021). The F1‐score is a statistical measure used in binary classification to evaluate the accuracy of a model's predictions and calculated as the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balance between these two metrics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be concluded that it represents a substantial advancement and simplification based on the prior studies [1,3,25,33], where the explanations/conclusions were typically produced on the basis of an expert assessment of the obtained results. Compared to existing XAI approaches [34][35][36], the suggested framework attempts to imitate the standard scientific methodology, which is based on mathematical representations of the considered physical phenomena with the lowest number of parameters and its derivatives. Furthermore, using the predicted values, we attempt to analyze the reliability and accuracy of the results, which are related to well-known statistical metrics.…”
Section: Example Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%