2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01968-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method to Assess Coal Burst Risks Using Dynamic and Static Loading Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the differences in mining methods, fault structures, and other factors, there are various forms of island working face during coal mining, such as one sidewall mined out, two sidewalls mined out, three sidewalls mined out, and four sidewalls mined out (Li et al, 2015;He et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2020). The working face is impacted by the movement of the roof but also by the instability and failure of the overlying rocks above the sidewalls and the roof of the adjacent goafs.…”
Section: Conditions Of Adjacent Goafsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the differences in mining methods, fault structures, and other factors, there are various forms of island working face during coal mining, such as one sidewall mined out, two sidewalls mined out, three sidewalls mined out, and four sidewalls mined out (Li et al, 2015;He et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2020). The working face is impacted by the movement of the roof but also by the instability and failure of the overlying rocks above the sidewalls and the roof of the adjacent goafs.…”
Section: Conditions Of Adjacent Goafsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai et al (2015), Zhu et al (2016), and Chen et al (2021) investigated the relationship between the tomographic images of P wave velocity and coal burst hazard and believed that coal burst hazard could be detected by passive seismic velocity tomography during longwall face mining and entry excavation. Li et al (2015), He et al (2017), and Wang et al (2020) proposed a static and dynamic stresses superpositionbased risk evaluation method of coal burst to pre-evaluate coal burst risk. Ahmed et al (2017) proposed the Burst Potential Index (BPI) to estimate pillar burst tendency based on the energy storage rate (ESR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on various source parameters, many seismic analysing methods for evaluating seismic risks have been developed. Prominent examples are the variation of event counts and seismic energy [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], seismic clustering [ 12 , 13 ], wave velocity tomography [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], and ground motion analysis [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], which obtained encouraging results in seismic hazard forecasting. However, because of the complicated monitoring environment, the performance of seismic analysing methods can be significantly limited by poor seismic data integrity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al [37] studied the dynamic analysis method of rock burst risk of a longwall working face intersecting with fault. Cong et al [38,39] evaluated the increase of rock burst risk caused by dynamic load disturbance in the fault area through the vibration effect index. Li et al [40] studied the disaster mechanism and safe mining technology when the working face of deep well, thick topsoil, and thick bedrock is mined to the square position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%