1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb08590.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method of distinguishing Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii) up to one year old from adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age was classed as either juvenile (born that year) or adult (born the previous year or earlier) [16]. The ‘chin-spot’ [17] was not used to distinguish between adults and juveniles as some individuals retained it for up to at least four years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age was classed as either juvenile (born that year) or adult (born the previous year or earlier) [16]. The ‘chin-spot’ [17] was not used to distinguish between adults and juveniles as some individuals retained it for up to at least four years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such inconsistencies, relative to the pattern described for Pipistrellus pipistrellus, would explain the anomalous changes from mature to immature classi®cations of bats caught between 1978 and 1989 and classi®ed by Racey's (1974a) criterion. A recent study of Myotis daubentonii also suggested that the coloration of epididymides was not a valid indicator of sexual maturity in that species, since ®rst-year males (de®ned from the presence of black pigmented chin spots: Richardson, 1994), were found with spermatozoa in their testes and had undergone some epididymal distension, despite the presence of black caudae epididymides (Kokurewicz & Bartma Ânska, 1992). The present study suggested that, in P. auritus, the size and shape of the caudae epididymides were more appropriate indicators of sexual maturity than was colour.…”
Section: Determination Of Sexual Maturity In Malesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sex was determined by visual inspection and young of the year were distinguished from adults based on the presence of unfused and translucent phalangeal epiphyses (Anthony 1988;Racey 1988) and a 'chin-spot' (Richardson 1994;Geiger et al 1996) in the former. Body mass was measured with a digital balance (Kern EM 150-1, BallingenFrommern, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 g. Reproductive status of females was classified as pregnant, non-pregnant, lactating, and post-lactating according to the methods described by Racey (1982).…”
Section: Capture Of Batsmentioning
confidence: 99%