2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method of creating intervertebral disc disruption of various grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…# -comparisons among muscle conditions, P , 0.05 The simulation criteria of disc degeneration and muscle dysfunction were used for the following reasons. First, many intervertebral disc degeneration models have been reported for both in vivo and in vitro studies, including the stab models [29], annular tear models [30], disc injection models with enzyme [31] or with nitrogen gas [32], and fatigue models with repetitive flexion-extension and compression loads [33]. These methods were costly, time consuming, or difficult to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…# -comparisons among muscle conditions, P , 0.05 The simulation criteria of disc degeneration and muscle dysfunction were used for the following reasons. First, many intervertebral disc degeneration models have been reported for both in vivo and in vitro studies, including the stab models [29], annular tear models [30], disc injection models with enzyme [31] or with nitrogen gas [32], and fatigue models with repetitive flexion-extension and compression loads [33]. These methods were costly, time consuming, or difficult to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of gas pressurization of the annulus correlated to the degree of disruption of the disc tissue seen on MRI and on gross inspection. 28 Pressures studied included 69, 172, 345, and 690 kPa, correlating to 10, 25, 50, and 100 psi respectively. Carragee's discography protocols routinely used a threshold of 100 psi above opening pressure.…”
Section: Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%