2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ngib.2019.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for well pattern density optimization and recovery efficiency evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For well density design, the general approach [2] is to design several possible well spacings for the development, estimate the gas output with such methods as numerical simulation, calculate economic benefits according to the estimated output, and select the best well density according to the comparative benefits. e research mainly focuses on the impact mechanism of well density on the final output, for instance, the impact of different well densities on the recovery ratio [3]; although some researchers, considering the time value of funds [4], have chosen the discounted cashflow method to calculate the economic limits of well density, they failed to consider such realistic situations as changes in the prices and subsidies in the future. e design of drilling depth is less subjective than that of well density because the depth of the gas-bearing layer is often determined objectively, and the research on depth limits is generally in engineering and technical perspectives, such as drilling methods [5], reservoir forming conditions [6], changes in reservoir conditions [7], and brittle ductility [8].…”
Section: Overview Of Methods For Defining Economic Limits Of Development Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For well density design, the general approach [2] is to design several possible well spacings for the development, estimate the gas output with such methods as numerical simulation, calculate economic benefits according to the estimated output, and select the best well density according to the comparative benefits. e research mainly focuses on the impact mechanism of well density on the final output, for instance, the impact of different well densities on the recovery ratio [3]; although some researchers, considering the time value of funds [4], have chosen the discounted cashflow method to calculate the economic limits of well density, they failed to consider such realistic situations as changes in the prices and subsidies in the future. e design of drilling depth is less subjective than that of well density because the depth of the gas-bearing layer is often determined objectively, and the research on depth limits is generally in engineering and technical perspectives, such as drilling methods [5], reservoir forming conditions [6], changes in reservoir conditions [7], and brittle ductility [8].…”
Section: Overview Of Methods For Defining Economic Limits Of Development Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for shale gas, China's shale gas is mainly produced in Chongqing and Sichuan. In 2018, Fuling in Chongqing produced 6.02 billion m 3 of shale gas, and the shale gas output of PetroChina in Sichuan was 4.27 billion m 3 . erefore, the producer price indexes of oil and natural gas exploration industries (O&G PPI) in Chongqing City and Sichuan Province were selected as the price indexes of shale gas weighted according to this proportion.…”
Section: Prediction Of Future Prices Of Unconventional Natural Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of gas reservoirs, in order to further clarify the remaining geological reserves and the distribution of remaining oil and gas on the plane well points, it is necessary to calculate the geological reserves of a single well, and the calculation of the control area of a single well is the top priority of determining the geological reserves of a single well. In general, the current methods for calculating the control area of a single well are mainly divided into three types: empirical formula method [1][2][3] , area trade-off method [4][5][6][7] , and physical model [8][9][10] . Among them, the empirical formula method uses pressure recovery well testing as a means to obtain calculation data, but for low-permeability gas wells, the pressure recovery time is long and it is difficult to obtain accurate data; the area trade-off method is based on the triangulation algorithm, but it believes that single well control The range is within 1/2 of the distance between adjacent wells, and the influence of the heterogeneity of the actual gas reservoir on the control area of a single well is not considered, which is contrary to the actual situation; the physical model method uses the logging interpretation data to perform geological modeling.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, water in the formation sealed off the reservoir, which made it impossible to recover a large amount of natural gas reserves effectively and drastically reduced the recovery rate [2] . Drainage gas extraction was a technological measure to solve the problem of excessive fluid accumulation or water production in the formation near the wellbore and well bottoming and to restore the gas well to normal production, the purpose of which was to delay and avoid flooding of the gas wells, improved the production condition of the gas reservoir, and increased the efficiency of gas reservoir development and recovery rate, which had a pivotal role in the development process of the gas field [3] . At present, the principle of gas drainage is mainly from the gas dynamics method [4] , physicochemical method [5] , and artificial lifting method [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%