1982
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for updating SU(N) matrices in computer simulations of gauge theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
405
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 501 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
405
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our calculations of the magnetic-monopole current configuration, we fix the center on the origin 154) and change the value of ρ. The results are summarized in Table 1 and Fig.…”
Section: One Instantons and Magnetic Monopole Loops On The Latticementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our calculations of the magnetic-monopole current configuration, we fix the center on the origin 154) and change the value of ρ. The results are summarized in Table 1 and Fig.…”
Section: One Instantons and Magnetic Monopole Loops On The Latticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we generate gauge field configurations of link variables {U x,µ } on a four-dimensional Euclidean lattice L ǫ = (ǫZ) 4 with a lattice spacing ǫ by using the standard method: the Wilson action based on the heat bath method for G = SU(2), the Wilson action based on the pseudo heat-bath method [154] for G = SU(3).…”
Section: Lattice Reduction Condition and Color Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quenched simulations are performed using the standard mix of Brown -Woch microcanonical over-relaxation [33] and Cabibbo -Mari-nari heat bath updates [34], performed on all N(N − 1)/2 SU(2) subgroups of the SU(N) link variables. It is known that simulations performed on SU(2) subgroups suffer critical slowing down at larger N, but the largest N is only 7 and this problem did not appear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canonical ensemble of gauge field configurations was generated using a combination of microcanonical over-relaxation (MOR) [9] and quasi-heat-bath (QHB) algorithms [10]. An individual MOR or QHB step consisted of updating consecutively the three 2 × 2 submatrices of the SU(3) link variable [11]. In our implementation five MOR steps were followed by two QHB ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%