1992
DOI: 10.1080/01411599208207746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for the study of antiparallel ferroelectric domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown in the investigations of the domain structure of some boracites (Schmid, 1969; Schmid & Tippmann, 1978), that examination by means of PLM is the most direct method to reveal their static domain structure, as the polarization vector P s and optical indicatrix are differently orientated in every domain. Besides PLM, a number of different techniques are available for imaging domains in ferroelectric/ferroelastic crystals (for a review of these methods see Kahmann et al ., 1992; Lines & Glass, 1979), each of which has advantages and disadvantages depending on the ferroelectric material on hand. Thus, for example, SEM with its inherent higher resolution was for a long time not applicable to ferroelectric domain observations because of the charging of the specimen surface by the primary electron beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in the investigations of the domain structure of some boracites (Schmid, 1969; Schmid & Tippmann, 1978), that examination by means of PLM is the most direct method to reveal their static domain structure, as the polarization vector P s and optical indicatrix are differently orientated in every domain. Besides PLM, a number of different techniques are available for imaging domains in ferroelectric/ferroelastic crystals (for a review of these methods see Kahmann et al ., 1992; Lines & Glass, 1979), each of which has advantages and disadvantages depending on the ferroelectric material on hand. Thus, for example, SEM with its inherent higher resolution was for a long time not applicable to ferroelectric domain observations because of the charging of the specimen surface by the primary electron beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, this stochastic mechanism can be applied to all molecular crystals built from achiral dipolar compounds. , The first experimental proof to support this basic growth mechanism comes from scanning pyroelectric microscopy (SPEM) with which needle-shaped solution-grown crystals of size 1−3 mm in length and 0.2−0.5 mm in thickness have been investigated. , The SPEM technique also allows a tomographic view by layerwise thinning of crystals 7 and has currently achieved a lateral resolution of about 2.5 μm, averaging over a surface layer thickness of ∼10 μm . For an overview of conventional domain observation techniques for inorganic crystals, see ref .
1 (A) Schematic representation of the growth of PHTP host−guest (triangles−pills) crystals: interactions between acceptor (A) and donor (D) terminal groups [dark (A) and bright (D) cappings of the pills] control the alignment of guests during growth along channels.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain number of techniques has been devised (for a review of known methods see, for example, Kahmann et al, 1992) for observing the domain structure of ferroelectric crystals, each of which offers advantages and disadvantages, depending on the ferroelectric material in hand. In the case of most boracites, for example, which undergo a phase transition from a high-temperature cubic phase (optically isotropic) to a low-temperature orthorhombic, tetragonal, monoclinic and/or trigonal (all optically anisotropic) phase, their domain structure has been traditionally studied by polarized-light microscopy (PLM) in both transmitted and reflected mode (Schmid, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%