1993
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.4.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for single pile settlement prediction and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pile load-displacement curves for the friction and end-bearing piles are shown in Figure 3, where they are compared with analyses using the CemSet method developed by Fleming (1992). The CemSet parameters used to re-produce the pile test response are summarised in (Selemetas, 2005).…”
Section: Pile Response During Initial Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pile load-displacement curves for the friction and end-bearing piles are shown in Figure 3, where they are compared with analyses using the CemSet method developed by Fleming (1992). The CemSet parameters used to re-produce the pile test response are summarised in (Selemetas, 2005).…”
Section: Pile Response During Initial Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple assessment of the effects of tunnelling induced movements on the load distribution in a pile can be made by using the framework of Fellenius (1988) and the CemSet method by Fleming (1992). Figure 14 shows the key load changes for pile FC as presented in Figure 11b (when the EPBM face is beneath the pile and post tunnelling) compared with the envelope of theoretical ultimate shaft friction (USF) along the length of the pile, as back-calculated from the CemSet analysis carried out after the pile loading test.…”
Section: Pile Design For Piles Subjected To Tunnelling-induced Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-cohesive soil 28: According to the calculation expression for drilled piles proposed by Fleming (1992), the unit tip resistance is 15 to 20% of the q c value when the tip deflection is 0·1D (D is pile diameter). The value of n ranges from 0·15 to 0·25, and the value for cohesive soil is slightly larger than that for sandy soil and silt.…”
Section: Pile Base Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow maintained load (ML) tests on piles in the field are generally carried out at a design load of twice the nominal working load for a period of a few days, so that a settlement criterion can be checked (Fellenius, 1980). Extrapolation techniques based on hyperbolic load-settlement relations have proved reasonably accurate and offer the opportunity to make settlement predictions after only 1 day of testing (Fleming, 1992). Faster constant rate of penetration (CRP) tests and quasi-dynamic tests rely on rate effect corrections, and generally require prior correlations with ML tests on the same soil (Brown et al, 2006).…”
Section: Uncertainties Due To Construction Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%