2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition 2006
DOI: 10.1109/psce.2006.296204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Placement of DG Units in Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis will be conducted in IEEE 30-bus test system, hence there are thirty locations to be determined for DG placement. The overall optimization problem can be summarized as follows: (8) ΣP G = ΣP D + P loss (9) ΣQ G = ΣQ D + Q loss (10) Control variables in the FA are : i-th individual in Firefly Algorithm Constraint (6) is significant for overall system stability assessment, while constraint (7) ensures that the voltage does not violate the system requirement. In this study, the lower limit for the voltage is set to be 0.85 per-unit rather than 0.95 per-unit due to the increasing reactive loading that will be used in the experiment.…”
Section: Proposed Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis will be conducted in IEEE 30-bus test system, hence there are thirty locations to be determined for DG placement. The overall optimization problem can be summarized as follows: (8) ΣP G = ΣP D + P loss (9) ΣQ G = ΣQ D + Q loss (10) Control variables in the FA are : i-th individual in Firefly Algorithm Constraint (6) is significant for overall system stability assessment, while constraint (7) ensures that the voltage does not violate the system requirement. In this study, the lower limit for the voltage is set to be 0.85 per-unit rather than 0.95 per-unit due to the increasing reactive loading that will be used in the experiment.…”
Section: Proposed Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal installation, sizing and operation of DG units connected directly to the network can be determined by several methods. Mainly, there are four methods can be used in optimal DG placement such as the L-index method, Voltage Stability Margin Index (VSMI) method, Voltage Performance Index (VPI) method and Loss Sensitivity Factor (LSF) [6][7][8][9][10]. Placement via LSF requires simulation of load flow to obtain the resulted real power loss with respect to the DG's injected real power (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each generation of the EA, a new set of approximations is created by the process of selecting individuals according to their fitness in the problem domain and reproducing them using variation operators [8]. Reference [9] presented a technique to determine optimal location and sizing of DG to increase maximum loadability limits. The computation of maximum loadability is crucial since it is capable to measure how close the system operation to its stability limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal distributed generation (DG) placement, a mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, has been solved by various methods including repetitive load flow [1], the weakest bus searching [2], traditional basic particle swarm (BPSO) [3], genetic algorithm (GA) [4], and linear programming [5]. Moreover, there are various objectives for optimal DG placement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA in Ref. [4] optimized the allocation and sizing of DGs to trade off between the benefit of loss reduction cost and total cost including investment cost, installation cost, and maintenance cost. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%