2015
DOI: 10.1002/mop.29094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for optimizing RCS of the nose of flying objects

Abstract: This article aimed to optimize radar cross section (RCS) of the nose of flying objects using a new shaping method. In this method, parameters related to the scatterer shape can continuously change. Thus, precise optimization can be carried out. The nose of flying objects with desired size and sharpness was defined by mathematical formula with two parameters. The physical optics method was also applied to calculate RCS. Design curves were calculated by changing sharpness and size criteria of the nose of flying … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some related articles exist in the literature that deal with body‐shaping of perfectly conducting objects 24–27 . To provide a fair comparison and highlight our proposed method's strengths and weaknesses, these works will be briefly reviewed.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some related articles exist in the literature that deal with body‐shaping of perfectly conducting objects 24–27 . To provide a fair comparison and highlight our proposed method's strengths and weaknesses, these works will be briefly reviewed.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback is requiring many iterations and several frequencies to retrieve the location of the object accurately which takes a considerable amount of time. The work of Hoseini et al 25 presented a technique to optimize RCS of the nose of a flying object by modifying the sharpness and size of the nose. However, this method is more of a trial and error method than an inverse scattering problem.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation