2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00546.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance from disk test results for comparative purposes

Abstract: The normalized resistance interpretation offers a new approach to comparative surveillance studies whereby the inhibition zone diameter results from disk tests in clinical laboratories can be used for calibration of the test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOPs proposed for antibiotic studies address, among other things: the assessment of antibiotic resistance using a disc susceptibility test for various genera of microorganisms (Andrews 2001;Kronvall et al 2003;Wikler et al 2009a) and specifically, for aquaculture-organisms at international level (Huys et al 2005) and infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria (Jorgensen et al 2005); broth dilution and disk diffusion antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts (Rex et al 2008(Rex et al , 2009; and dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for aerobic bacteria (Wikler et al 2009b). …”
Section: Standardization Of Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOPs proposed for antibiotic studies address, among other things: the assessment of antibiotic resistance using a disc susceptibility test for various genera of microorganisms (Andrews 2001;Kronvall et al 2003;Wikler et al 2009a) and specifically, for aquaculture-organisms at international level (Huys et al 2005) and infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria (Jorgensen et al 2005); broth dilution and disk diffusion antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts (Rex et al 2008(Rex et al , 2009; and dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for aerobic bacteria (Wikler et al 2009b). …”
Section: Standardization Of Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the term epidemiological breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF), has been proposed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) to describe the upper MIC limit of the susceptible peak in an MIC distribution, the wild-type (WT) population. MIC distributions of WT isolates species-wise for many antimicrobials have been published on the internet by EUCAST and are publicly available (http://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions/) (5, 6).Normalized resistance interpretation (NRI) is an objective method to define the WT population in inhibition zone diameter histograms (4,8,10). The method has been used for setting interpretive breakpoints in an 18-year resistance surveillance, and also in an investigation of meropenem susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalised resistance interpretation (NRI) was performed according to the method of Joneberg et al (2003), Kronvall (2003) and Kronvall et al (2003). Peak values were established using 5 point rolling means and the mean and standard deviation of the real distribution of fully susceptible (wild type) strains were calculated using a plot of probit values against zone size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%