2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01639-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for measuring the conduction velocities of Aβ-, Aδ- and C-fibers following electric and CO2 laser stimulation in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies using a laser beam to a tiny area of skin [4,9,10,27], which is known to selectively activate C fibers, the mean P1 latency for stimulation of the hand was 930-1144 ms, which is very similar to the present results. The estimated CV of 1.5 m/s in this study was also consistent with previous studies showing a value of 0.8 -2.8 m/s by averaged EEG [4,27,28] and 0.4 -1.8 m/s [29] by microneurography. In terms of the precise measurement of CV, microneurography is superior to EEG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In previous studies using a laser beam to a tiny area of skin [4,9,10,27], which is known to selectively activate C fibers, the mean P1 latency for stimulation of the hand was 930-1144 ms, which is very similar to the present results. The estimated CV of 1.5 m/s in this study was also consistent with previous studies showing a value of 0.8 -2.8 m/s by averaged EEG [4,27,28] and 0.4 -1.8 m/s [29] by microneurography. In terms of the precise measurement of CV, microneurography is superior to EEG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For the C fiber stimulation, we used a method that has been shown to be C fiber-mediated by conduction velocity measurements and that evokes only the sensation of warmth without a tactile or pin prick component when applied to glabrous skin (Granovsky et al, 2005). The shorter latency of this response, compared to C fiber-mediated potentials evoked by infrared laser stimulation (Tran et al, 2001;Opsommer et al, 2001), is probably due to several factors, including a longer stimulus duration (approximately 10 to 300 times longer) and a much larger stimulation area (30 to 3000 times greater). We could not detect electrophysiological evidence for the activation of Aδ fibers with this stimulus.…”
Section: Selectivity Of the Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can be implemented by interposing a thin plate, drilled with one or more small holes, between the stimulus probe and the skin surface in order to act as a spatial filter for the laser beam 15,16,17 . The principle of this method is based on higher innervation density of C-fiber terminals on the skin (three or four times more numerous than Aδ-fibers in humans), resulting in a higher probability of stimulating the terminals of C-fibers than those of Aδ-fibers 18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%