2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-008-0384-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for mapping variability in vertical seepage flux in streambeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al (2009) noted that the positive and negative VHG values could occur between two locations only several meters apart for the streambed sediments in the Elkhorn River of Nebraska, which indicates the significant presence of downward and upward flux at water-streambed interface. Similar findings were reported by Leek et al (2009).…”
Section: Streambed K V Values Between Schuyler and Ashland In The Plamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chen et al (2009) noted that the positive and negative VHG values could occur between two locations only several meters apart for the streambed sediments in the Elkhorn River of Nebraska, which indicates the significant presence of downward and upward flux at water-streambed interface. Similar findings were reported by Leek et al (2009).…”
Section: Streambed K V Values Between Schuyler and Ashland In The Plamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…TIR cameras sense and quantify surface infrared (heat) radiation and are increasingly being used to evaluate aquatic systems efficiently on large scales (Chen et al, 2009;Deitchman and Loheide, 2009;Dugdale et al, 2016;Handcock et al, 2012;Hare et al, 2015), particularly at large sites, or sites where in situ measurements are not possible. The hand-held TIR survey was conducted to both expand the thermal survey and to compare this method to the FO-DTS data.…”
Section: Infrared Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), Calver () and Chen et al . (). These techniques include grain‐size analysis of streambed sediments, slug tests, hydrometric measurements, direct measurements of streamflow increments (commonly called a seepage run), tracer techniques and seepage flux measurements using seepage meters (Cey et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%