2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for gravity modeling using tesseroids and 2D Gauss-Legendre quadrature rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting surface integral is then numerically solved by using the GLQ rule (e.g., Wild-Pfeiffer 2008), or by the split quadrature method using the double exponential quadrature (DEQ) rule, resulting in the so-called DEQ method (e.g., Fukushima 2017Fukushima , 2018. Most recently, Zhong et al (2019) proposed a new method for computing the gravity field of a tesseroid, in which the original volume integral is first transformed into two surface and four edge integrals, and then the GLQ rule is adapted to evaluate these integrals. In comparison with the TSE method, the quadrature method (e.g., GLQ method) is able to provide more accurate approximations on the cost of more computational time (e.g., Lin and Denker 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting surface integral is then numerically solved by using the GLQ rule (e.g., Wild-Pfeiffer 2008), or by the split quadrature method using the double exponential quadrature (DEQ) rule, resulting in the so-called DEQ method (e.g., Fukushima 2017Fukushima , 2018. Most recently, Zhong et al (2019) proposed a new method for computing the gravity field of a tesseroid, in which the original volume integral is first transformed into two surface and four edge integrals, and then the GLQ rule is adapted to evaluate these integrals. In comparison with the TSE method, the quadrature method (e.g., GLQ method) is able to provide more accurate approximations on the cost of more computational time (e.g., Lin and Denker 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fukushima (2017Fukushima ( , 2018) developed a novel method, which first computes the GP of the tesseroids at an arbitrary point with very high precision by the powerful DEQ rule and then approximates the GV and GGT by numerical partial differentiation of the computed GP. In Li et al (2011), Grombein et al (2013), Uieda et al (2016), Lin and Denker (2019), Soler et al (2019), andZhong et al (2019), the improvement of the approximation is achieved by regularly or adaptively subdividing the tesseroids close to the computation point into smaller tesseroid elements along both horizontal and vertical dimensions or only in the horizontal dimension first, and then summing all effects of the subdivided tesseroid elements computed by the GLQ rule. Among the above-mentioned approaches, the last one is easy to implement and further requires no elementary body conversion, flat Earth approximation, coordinate transformation, tesseroid rotation, and numerical differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only five components of the gravity gradient tensor are independent since the tensor components are symmetric and T rr + T θθ + T φφ = 0. As analytical solutions are unavailable, we use Gauss‐Legendre quadrature to evaluate the integrals in Equations 1–3 in the forward modeling (Asgharzadeh et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2020; Uieda et al., 2016; Zhong et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative errors in log 10 scale of the GGT and GC are large than 0 below the height of about 24 km and 50 km, respectively. The key to solving the near-zone problem of the GC of the tesseroid lies in the improvement of the numerical algorithm to calculate the triple or double integrals and the selection of the geometrical shape of the tesseroid mass body, e.g., the rotation method (Marotta and Barzaghi 2017;Marotta et al 2019), splitting line method using the double exponential quadrature (Fukushima 2018a), different types of the regular, adaptive and combined subdivision (Li et al 2011;Grombein et al 2013;Shen and Deng 2016;Uieda et al 2016;Deng and Shen 2019;Lin and Denker 2019;Soler et al 2019;Zhong et al 2019;Zhao et al 2019;Lin et al 2020;Chen 2020, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%