2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Direct Determination of Char Yield during Solid Fuel Pyrolysis in Drop-Tube Furnace at High Temperature and Its Comparison with Ash Tracer Method

Abstract: A drop-tube furnace with a novel double-tube configuration was successfully developed to directly determine char yields during the pyrolysis of a wide range of solid fuels (mallee wood; mallee leaf; rice husk; biosolid; and subbituminous, bituminous, and anthracite coal) at a gas temperature of 1573 K. The char yield from pyrolysis of mallee wood and mallee leaf is <5%, ∼13% for rice husk, ∼16% for biosolid, ∼45% for subbituminous and bituminous coal, and ∼75% for anthracite coal. The retentions of Na, K, Mg, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the results obtained by Weber method, it seems plausible to suspect that the difference was caused by the fact that inorganic content was affected to the greatest extent by the HTC process, performed at relatively long residence time. Both ash tracer method and Weber method, are based on the assumption that all of the ash, originally present in valorized biomass, remains in the solid product [49,63]. However, the Weber method compares the content of ash and fixed carbon combined, thus making the influence of any loss of inorganic part from solid fraction smaller [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the results obtained by Weber method, it seems plausible to suspect that the difference was caused by the fact that inorganic content was affected to the greatest extent by the HTC process, performed at relatively long residence time. Both ash tracer method and Weber method, are based on the assumption that all of the ash, originally present in valorized biomass, remains in the solid product [49,63]. However, the Weber method compares the content of ash and fixed carbon combined, thus making the influence of any loss of inorganic part from solid fraction smaller [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: Ym-mass yield (further part of the subscript indicating a method); VM-respective volatile matter content of feedstock and product, % dry Moreover, the mass yield was also assessed, using well-established ash tracer method, used for indirect assessment of mass losses, during various thermal conversion processes [63]:…”
Section: Hydrothermal Carbonisation-experimental Rig and Characterisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isothermal plug flow reactor (IPFR) was used to study the effect of rapid heating on biomass material with three torrefaction degrees, the reactivity of the chars was determined by calculating weight loss through the ash tracer method and it was found that the biomass with higher torrefaction has lower reactivity [32]. The filament platinum pyrolyzer [31], custom made thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) furnace [33] and the drop tube furnace method [13], [26]- [29], [34], [35] have all been used to produce chars through rapid heating to different final temperatures. The solid char particles produced via these experimental techniques were used for further analysis to investigate the effect of different rapid heating conditions on char formation.…”
Section: Figure 1 a Schematic Of Hisarna Technology Combining The Ccf...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charcoal from fast pyrolysis exhibits a higher volatile matter content compared to slow pyrolysis char produced at same temperature [172]. The charcoal yield of wood and herbaceous biomass decreases to less than 4% on dry ash free basis at temperatures above 1000 • C [173,174], whereas the formation of soot increases at temperatures larger than 900 • C with a maximum yield between 1100 to 1250 • C [97,175]. Biomass with a high lignin content will form larger soot yields compared to biomass which is enriched in cellulose or xylan content [171,176], in which the soot and tar formation is reduced by high concentrations of alkali metals.…”
Section: Fast Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%