1962
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(62)90104-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for determination of the average composition of a granite massif

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From figure 3 it appears that the three major rock types are nearly equally represented in the exposed part of the batholith. This crude zonal arrangement resembles that in plutons of similar composition the world over (Whitten, 1962;Nilssen and Smithson, 1965;Bateman and others, 1963).…”
Section: The Batholithsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…From figure 3 it appears that the three major rock types are nearly equally represented in the exposed part of the batholith. This crude zonal arrangement resembles that in plutons of similar composition the world over (Whitten, 1962;Nilssen and Smithson, 1965;Bateman and others, 1963).…”
Section: The Batholithsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…(Whitten, 1963) were fitted to these points, the quadratic component ( Figure 2B) being the highest order to add significantly to the sum of squares (Whitten, 1962;Dawson & Whitten, 1962). The quadratic surface explains 93.52 per cent of the variation observed in the outcrop elevations, adding 2.5 per cent to the linear sum of squares with a confidence level of > 99 per cent; whereas the further contribution of the cubic component of a mere 0.39 per cent has a confidence level of < 75 per cent.…”
Section: The Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method employed here is explained by Whitten (1962 and1963) and involves the approximation of the observed soil parameters of median grain size and percentage silt and clay (i.e. passing the number 200 sieve) by mathematical surfaces of polynomial form fitted by the method of least squares.…”
Section: Rj Chorleymentioning
confidence: 99%